A session built for a distributed audience and a real budget, often ninety minutes rather than a full day.
You have a leadership bench that came up fast, managers running teams without ever being taught the fundamentals, and no internal L&D function to build the program. You need something defensible enough to take to finance.
Staff development that people will actually use, for teams spread across centers and locations who are not operating as one unit. I have run this at Washington State University and University of Houston-Clear Lake.
A breakout or an intensive with real practice in it, not a talk with a worksheet attached.
Before we are ever in a room together, I run a confidential pre-survey, and for longer programs the Energy Leadership Index assessment. I am looking for the gap between what leadership believes is happening and what the team is experiencing. That gap is usually the whole engagement.
A half-day or full-day session built from what the survey surfaced.
Frameworks are simple and visual on purpose, because a framework nobody can redraw on a whiteboard is a framework nobody uses. The day closes on team agreements and named action items, not takeaways.
Monthly cohort coaching for the months that follow, so people bring back what did not work and get help with it.
Groups larger than one cohort get split rather than crowded, because practice stops happening in a big room.
We agree on three or four indicators before anything starts and take a baseline. Usually that includes pre and post assessment scores, a midpoint check, and one or two measures your leadership already tracks.
Whoever approved the budget should be able to see what changed.
CLIENT WINS, IN THEIR WORDS
CLIENT, CANDLELIGHTERS ORG.
Dhara brought an incredible level of thoughtfulness, care, and insight to our team. Her guidance challenged us to think differently about communication, collaboration, and individual ownership while also empowering us to recognize the value each person brings to our team.
We left feeling both challenged and encouraged—and truly grateful for the investment Dhara made in our team. We would absolutely recommend her to any organization looking to strengthen their team and grow together.
Steve Bischoff, Director of Multicultural Student Services, WSU
Our department was happy to have Dhara's expertise support the development of our team dynamics. She was able to tailor her coaching based on our team's feedback prior to her full day training.
We have been taking the next steps for implementation and adapting as needed to meet our needs within higher education. I highly recommend her coaching prowess whether your team is operating at a high level or needing a boost since she has a wide range of professional knowledge to improve your staff.
Dominique J. Faga’autau, Associate Director, Multicultural Student Services
Dhara’s training in June was incredibly valuable for our team. She provided a practical, solution-focused framework that helped us become more cohesive and supportive of one another. Through her guidance, we developed strategies to work through challenges more effectively and strengthen our collaboration.
Ms. Mistry helped us build skills in communication, empathy, and sharing concerns in a constructive way. The training has had a lasting positive impact on how we work together and support our team members.”
Not values on a wall. Specific commitments the team writes themselves, in front of each other, with names attached.
Situation, Behavior, Impact. A structure that makes hard feedback sayable, which is usually the real blocker rather than willingness.
For teams where nobody is sure who actually decides. Deceptively simple, and it settles arguments that have been running for years.
An attitudinal assessment measuring how your leaders respond under pressure rather than what personality type they are. Available as a self-assessment or as a 360 with rater feedback, and debriefed inside the program rather than handed over as a PDF.
Pre-survey, frameworks, practice, and team agreements. What I ran at Washington State University.
02
03
05
One topic, real practice, no filler.
What I run for ERGs and nonprofits, including Candlelighters.
One team, one problem, agreements at the close.
*Logistics note: Houston-based and working nationally, including on university campuses.
In person wherever it is possible, because the practice sections do not work as well on video.
Virtual where the audience is genuinely distributed.
04
Spaced sessions with practice in between, so people return with what actually happened.
What I ran at University of Houston-Clear Lake.
The full arc: assessment, foundational workshop, monthly cohort coaching, and measurement against a baseline.
01
Six to eight weeks for a workshop, and three months or more for a multi-session program, because the pre-survey and assessment work happens before we are ever in a room together. If your date is sooner than that, ask anyway. I keep some room for it.
Yes. I am Houston-based and I work nationally, including full-day sessions on university campuses and companies. Travel is billed at cost and agreed in the proposal, never added afterward.
There is no version of this that is not customized. Every engagement starts with a confidential pre-survey, and for longer programs the Energy Leadership Index assessment, and the session is built from what your people actually said. I do not have a deck I bring with me.
It depends on the format, the size of the group, and whether there is follow-on coaching, so I do not publish a flat rate that would be wrong for most of the people reading it.
However, if you have a budget in mind sharing that in advance also helps eliminate any back and forth and help us align if we are a good fit so feel free to share what you are working with during our intro call.
It depends more on format than headcount. A keynote scales to a room of any size. A workshop needs everyone practicing out loud, so past a certain point I will suggest running cohorts rather than filling a bigger room, and I will tell you that before you book rather than after.
If your group is smaller than a workshop justifies, coaching is often the better and cheaper answer, and I will say so.
A workshop is a day. Your team leaves with frameworks, shared language, and agreements they made out loud in front of each other. A program is that day plus the months after it: monthly cohort coaching, named accountability, and a measurement plan. Choose the workshop if you want to shift one specific thing. Choose the program if the pattern has already survived your previous attempts to fix it.
We agree on three or four indicators before the program starts and take a baseline, so there is something to compare against. Those usually include pre and post assessment scores, a midpoint check, and one or two measures your leadership already tracks. Whoever approved the budget should be able to see what changed without taking your word for it.
An attitudinal assessment that measures how a leader responds under pressure rather than sorting them into a personality type. I am certified as a Master Practitioner, which means I can run it as a self-assessment or as a 360 with rater feedback, and I debrief it live inside the program rather than emailing you a report.
Regularly. Universities are some of my favorite work, and nonprofits get a format built for the budget, often ninety minutes rather than a full day. Ask.
Not what you think you should ask for.
Fill this in and I will come back with a recommendation and a range.